implement way to do this, a hybrid approach will work best:
traditional page generation for the "read only" pages and gwt for
certain "editors". gwt's lack of data binding & field validation make
programming editors inconvenient. (gwt 2.1 has cell binding. To use it
for form fields, it appears one needs to use tables instead of forms.
smart-gwt has sophisticated binding & ext-gwt has some. The gwt google
group hasn't been complementary about these. I tried smart-gwt briefly
but realized a license & support would be very expensive.) gwt is
appealing when client-side processing is preferable to many server
round-trips.
On Oct 28, 9:47 pm, Ashton Thomas <ash...@acrinta.com> wrote:
> My startup company is using GWT (after a lot of research into what
> technology to go with for the user facing technology) for commercial
> use. However this isn't saying much since the produce isn't released
> yet...
>
> On Oct 28, 2:35 pm, Harpal Grover <harpal.gro...@gmail.com> wrote:> Yup definitely does, hopefully it makes headway into mainstream
> > consumer web use.
>
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jeff Schwartz <jefftschwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Corporate applications are some of the most demanding applications that one
> > > could develop so if companies are adopting GWT to develop them I think that
> > > speaks very highly of it.
>
> > > Jeff
>
> > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Harpal Grover <harpal.gro...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> Ok so it seems like GWT has major use internally for companies, but so
> > >> far is not a choice product to build commercial applications for
> > >> general consumer use yet. I like the framework as well and hopefully
> > >> it can make a push into consumer web applications, not just for
> > >> internal corporate use or android phone apps.
>
> > >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:51 AM, gcstang <gcst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > We use it within our company Micros-Retail, we use GWT, SmartGWT, gwt-
> > >> > log, and gwt-visualizations.
>
> > >> > On Oct 27, 8:46 am, markM <mark.a.mccon...@pfizer.com> wrote:
> > >> >> We use it within the Pfizer corporation. It's also been used within
> > >> >> Toyota U.S. You may also want to visit the smart-soft web site as
> > >> >> many of the companies listed there have probably taken GWT training.
>
> > >> >> It's a beautiful thing to no longer have to deal with JSP's. Even
> > >> >> with facilities like JSF, which was a huge advance, I still spent half
> > >> >> my time figuring out some screwy way to, say, display a dialog in
> > >> >> conjunction with making numerous necessary callbacks to the server. I
> > >> >> felt like I was spending half my time on non-requirements related
> > >> >> technical issues. I used to constantly have to do illogical and
> > >> >> unintuitive things to fix problems. In addition to the fact that most
> > >> >> JSP tools still don't do a good job of type checking leaving you
> > >> >> staring at your screen wondering why something isn't working or having
> > >> >> to chase through a stack trace to figure it out. When I moved to GWT
> > >> >> I felt like someone took the handcuffs off. It ain't perfect, not
> > >> >> technology is, but it's quite a bit better than anything I was using
> > >> >> before this. I use Spring on the back end and tools like incubator
> > >> >> for more complex ui work. All open source. No licenses. Thank you
> > >> >> Google! and don't become evil, at least as developers on the bottom
> > >> >> rung you have a choice!
>
> > >> >> On Oct 26, 11:25 am, PhilBeaudoin <philippe.beaud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > VMWare uses it in its new Code2Cloud
> > >> >> > project:http://tasktop.com/blog/tasktop/springsource-vmware-code2cloud
>
> > >> >> > Google do use it in many products, in particular adwords. There is a
> > >> >> > question on the topic in Quora, might be a good place to add some
>
> > >> >> > answers:https://www.quora.com/What-web-applications-use-Google-Web-Toolkit-(GWT)
>
> > >> >> > Philippe
>
> > >> >> > On Oct 26, 6:42 am, Stefan Bachert <stefanbach...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > Hi,
>
> > >> >> > > On 25 Okt., 11:06, Sir Codealot <blacat...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> > > > What major companies are already using GWT? I'm a little
> > >> >> > > > surprised
> > >> >> > > > that this sort of info is not available and obvious, front and
> > >> >> > > > center,
> > >> >> > > > on the GWT FAQs, but I can't find it.
>
> > >> >> > > I agree the business position of GWT is to weak in spite of its
> > >> >> > > strength.
> > >> >> > > Google itself does not earn with GWT so the incentives are weak.
>
> > >> >> > > Another point is, there are a lot of GUI technology out there. It
> > >> >> > > is
> > >> >> > > very hard for companies to decide
>
> > >> >> > > JSP, JSF, Iceface, ASF, Wicket, Qt, jquery,
> > >> >> > > Flash, Flex, SilverLight, JX,
> > >> >> > > GWT with smartClient, GWT with GXT, GWT with Mosaic, GWT pure,
> > >> >> > > CaptianCasa,
> > >> >> > > Vaadin
> > >> >> > > Swing, SWT, AWT
> > >> >> > > Eclipse RCP, Eclipse RAP,
> > >> >> > > quoxdoo
> > >> >> > > JAXX,
> > >> >> > > XUL.
>
> > >> >> > > I am surely missed the most.
> > >> >> > > Some of them are doing just half the way.
>
> > >> >> > > I know companies that are using GWT in some way
> > >> >> > > - RedHat
> > >> >> > > - IBM, Lombardi
> > >> >> > > - Google (quite sure)
>
> > >> >> > > However, sometimes a tool uses GWT but this is not really
> > >> >> > > published.
> > >> >> > > XWiki, Magnolia CMS for example
>
> > >> >> > > Stefan Bacherthttp://gwtworld.de-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > >> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> > --
> > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > >> > To post to this group, send email to
> > >> > google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > For more options, visit this group at
> > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > >> --
> > >> Harpal Grover
> > >> President
> > >> Harpal Grover Consulting Inc
>
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > > --
> > > Jeff
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Harpal Grover
> > President
> > Harpal Grover Consulting Inc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment