Sunday, July 31, 2011

Re: How can I get the "Expenses" sample up and running?

It works now though I don't know why.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/rfjTaKUS4ioJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

how to create form?

how to create a form in gwt..and i have get user id and password form
user..

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT/GPE 2.4.0 RC1 is available

Seeing that this new release involves new work in the area of cell
based widgets, it might be a great opportunity to fix a nasty keyboard
scrolling bug that I reported a few months back - see
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6383

I have looked at the new source code and the bug is still there. It is
an easy fix I think - which I posted with the bug report. It would be
great if we could get the fix into 2.4.0.

The bug involves scrolling up (ie back) using the keyboard (ie using
up arrow or page up keys) and occurs in any code that uses a
HasDataPresenter. This includes CellList, CellTable, and also the new
DataGrid.

See the bug report, but basically the bug involves the lack of a check
against the start row index going negative when scrolling back in
KeyboardPagingPolicy.CHANGE_PAGE mode.

This is a show stopper for my application which is close to production
release. In the absolute worst case, I will need to do a special build
of GWT in order to release my product. Obviously it would be much
preferable to get the bug fixed in 2.4.0.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT/GPE 2.4.0 RC1 is available

Seeing that this new release involves new work in the area of cell
based widgets, it might be a great opportunity to fix a nasty keyboard
scrolling bug that I reported a few months back - see
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6383

I have looked at the new source code and the bug is still there. It is
an easy fix I think - which I posted with the bug report. It would be
great if we could get the fix into 2.4.0.

The bug involves scrolling up (ie back) using the keyboard (ie using
up arrow or page up keys) and occurs in any code that uses a
HasDataPresenter. This includes CellList, CellTable, and also the new
DataGrid.

See the bug report, but basically the bug involves the lack of a check
against the start row index going negative when scrolling back in
KeyboardPagingPolicy.CHANGE_PAGE mode.

This is a show stopper for my application which is close to production
release. In the absolute worst case, I will need to do a special build
of GWT in order to release my product. Obviously it would be much
preferable to get the bug fixed in 2.4.0.

On Jul 28, 3:55 am, David Chandler <drfibona...@google.com> wrote:
> GWT 2.4.0 adds a new DataGrid widget with scrollable data area and
> many enhancements to RequestFactory (seehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_4).
>
> Google Plugin for Eclipse 2.4.0 introduces a wizard to publish your
> application to Google Apps Marketplace.
>
> SDK:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list
> Eclipse update sites:http://code.google.com/eclipse/beta/docs/download.html
>
> gwt-2.4.0-rc1 will appear in Maven Central shortly. Docs, Javadocs,
> and release notes will be published with the final release.
>
> --
> David Chandler
> Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE
> w:http://code.google.com/
> b:http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/
> b:http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/
> t: @googledevtools

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts

Thanks Brian to share!!

2011/7/31 Brian Reilly <brian.ireilly@gmail.com>
As promised, I committed my gwt-multipage changes (to a branch) and attached a test jar (gwtmultipage-core-20110731.jar) to the issue: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/issues/detail?id=21. It's not an official release yet, but that's the jar that I've been using it in production with GWT 2.3 for a couple of months now.

-- Brian



On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Brian Reilly <brian.ireilly@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that the current build is for GWT <= 2.1. If you're using 2.2+, currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself.

I did some work a couple of months ago to create a jar that would work for any version of GWT, but haven't committed it yet. In fact, that's the only reason I hadn't already mentioned gwt-multipage in this thread. Now that it has been mentioned, I'll make sure I commit my changes this weekend, at least on a branch.

BTW, the project page is http://gwtmultipage.org/, and the google code page is http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/.


-- Brian



On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
There is this,

http://claudiushauptmann.com/a-framework-for-gwt-multipage-applications.html

Which might be of interest to you.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, dreamer <venugopal.vasireddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start a new opensource project - "GWT page flows" - similar
> to struts.
>
> With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave
> application with pages, though components are there.
>
> Not all ajax applications are single page apps.
>
> Here are my thoughts from very high level  -
> ===================================================
> Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer.
> Weave all these pages with the help of something like "struts-
> config.xml".
> ======================================================
> It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component
> more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these
> lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page
> by page, only when it is needed.
>
>
> Few questions:
>
> Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is?
> Are these features available in any other form, that I did not
> realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want)
>
> Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts.
> - venu
> -  http://schoolk12.appspot.com/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

using jmock with jsni methods

Hi all,

i'm trying to use jmock for mocking object while testing our
application. While some of the classes make use of jsni methods which
form core part of application.
these classes are being used by classes which are used in test class.
e.g.
class Core uses jsni code for important functionality
class Manager creates object of Core class
class Client takes services from Manager class

Now what I need to test is Client class using CleintTest class

Can you suggest me how can it be done using jmock or any other mocking
framework
cause things fails due unsatisfied linking exception when it comes to
Core class which uses jsni code

Regards

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts

As promised, I committed my gwt-multipage changes (to a branch) and attached a test jar (gwtmultipage-core-20110731.jar) to the issue: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/issues/detail?id=21. It's not an official release yet, but that's the jar that I've been using it in production with GWT 2.3 for a couple of months now.

-- Brian


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Brian Reilly <brian.ireilly@gmail.com> wrote:
Note that the current build is for GWT <= 2.1. If you're using 2.2+, currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself.

I did some work a couple of months ago to create a jar that would work for any version of GWT, but haven't committed it yet. In fact, that's the only reason I hadn't already mentioned gwt-multipage in this thread. Now that it has been mentioned, I'll make sure I commit my changes this weekend, at least on a branch.

BTW, the project page is http://gwtmultipage.org/, and the google code page is http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/.


-- Brian



On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
There is this,

http://claudiushauptmann.com/a-framework-for-gwt-multipage-applications.html

Which might be of interest to you.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, dreamer <venugopal.vasireddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start a new opensource project - "GWT page flows" - similar
> to struts.
>
> With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave
> application with pages, though components are there.
>
> Not all ajax applications are single page apps.
>
> Here are my thoughts from very high level  -
> ===================================================
> Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer.
> Weave all these pages with the help of something like "struts-
> config.xml".
> ======================================================
> It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component
> more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these
> lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page
> by page, only when it is needed.
>
>
> Few questions:
>
> Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is?
> Are these features available in any other form, that I did not
> realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want)
>
> Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts.
> - venu
> -  http://schoolk12.appspot.com/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

GDATA WITH ECLIPSE

I used the new "Add google Api's" feature with the eclipse plugin for
google to add support for the calendar api to my project. Then I tried
to setup a test example using rpc to connect to the calender api on
the server side. HOWEVER, several classes and functions appear to be
missing from the gwt version of the gdata calendar api. and I cant
even follow this simple example without getting warnings for some
imports.

import com.google.gdata.client.*;
import com.google.gdata.client.calendar.*;
import com.google.gdata.data.*;
import com.google.gdata.data.acl.*;
import com.google.gdata.data.calendar.*;
import com.google.gdata.data.extensions.*;
import com.google.gdata.util.*;
import java.net.URL;

// Create a CalenderService and authenticate
CalendarService myService = new CalendarService("exampleCo-
exampleApp-1");
myService.setUserCredentials("jo@gmail.com", "mypassword");

// Send the request and print the response
URL feedUrl = new URL("https://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/default/
allcalendars/full
");
CalendarFeed resultFeed = myService.getFeed(feedUrl,
CalendarFeed.class);
System.out.println("Your calendars:");
System.out.println();
for (int i = 0; i < resultFeed.getEntries().size(); i++) {
CalendarEntry entry = resultFeed.getEntries().get(i);
System.out.println("\t" + entry.getTitle().getPlainText());
}

The ide instantly warns me that there is no source for the following
imports:
import com.google.gdata.util.*;
import com.google.gdata.data.acl.*;

I'm literally trying to follow this
http://code.google.com/apis/calendar/data/2.0/developers_guide_java.html
Line By Line, but because of some f***** annoying reason no
documentation exists to explain to my why i CANT do anything beyond
just creating an instance of CalendarService. I cant use any of the
functions listed in the example and it is driving me crazy since my
gwt development environment was auto setup by eclipse is it too much
for it to just work? and if its such a hassle to make it work, why is
there NO explanation on how to use the auto installed apparently
watered down version of the java client. I can see that it extends the
GoogleService class, So why am I unable to use ANY functions.

I'm using the most current versions of everything. Any help or
suggestions are much appreciated

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Aw: How to use RequestFactory: .with(propertyRefs) for composition of objects

The .with method accepts a string array via variable arguments. So you can write .with("a.b", "a.b.c", "a.b.c.d"). If you use RequestFactoryEditorDriver there is also a method called getPath() with returns the correct path array needed by your editors.

-- J.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/AsuqqMS0taAJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: How to use RequestFactory: .with(propertyRefs) for composition of objects

Hi there:

Assuming that your lists are named listB, listC, listD, then you would
write:
.with ("A.listB", "A.listB.listC", "A.listB.listC.listD")
to cause your various proxies to be populated by a single call to the
server.

Hope that helps,
Ryan

On Jul 31, 3:31 pm, basilboli <basilb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am newbie to GWT and  I need your professional advice.
>
> My question is :
>
> how to use RequestFactory: *.with(propertyRefs)* for kind of "tree"
> structures when
>
> these propertyRefs itself contains list of items I would like to retrieve.
>
> Some details:
>
> On the server-side I have hierarchy of four domain objects A,B,C,D:
>
>    - A object contains (or I'd better say keep reference to)  List <B>
>    - B contains List <C>
>    - C contains List <D>.
>
> All mentioned domain objects have its corresponding proxy interfaces AProxy,
> BProxy, CProxy, DProxy to use on the client side.
>
> On the client side I would like to get all that hierarchy of objects
>
> by once requesting AProxy object so I would profit from the easiness of data
> access using "get" methods and wouldn't be obliged to make looping server
> requests for every sub-object, sub-sub-objects etc.
>
> Due to specification I should use smth. like  .with("property ref") to get
> one level of hierarchy
>
> but what about retrieving following levels of compositions (in my case List
> <C> for every object B and List<D> for every object C).
>
> Thanks in advance.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT/GPE 2.4.0 RC1 is available

Will it be possible to use @Category on Proxies? Is there a way to
realize additional logic for RF proxies, with @Category or another
way? Currently I super sourced some RF core classes and replaced the
generator. I'am able to use @Category as described in AutoBeans. But
this means a lot of merging work on new releases. Did I miss something
with RF too implement additional logic in RF? It wouldn't be that much
work to enable @Category for proxies in a proper manner.

Another thing are all the private methods in RF / AutoBean generators
and in Service Layer logic on server side. These private methods
forces us to copy/paste a lot of code whenever we want to extend some
logic. What's the reason for this private restriction? Why not
protected?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

How to use RequestFactory: .with(propertyRefs) for composition of objects

Hello, 

I am newbie to GWT and  I need your professional advice.


My question is : 

how to use RequestFactory: .with(propertyRefs) for kind of "tree" structures when 

these propertyRefs itself contains list of items I would like to retrieve.


Some details: 

On the server-side I have hierarchy of four domain objects A,B,C,D:

  • A object contains (or I'd better say keep reference to)  List <B>
  • B contains List <C>
  • C contains List <D>.

All mentioned domain objects have its corresponding proxy interfaces AProxy, BProxy, CProxy, DProxy to use on the client side.


On the client side I would like to get all that hierarchy of objects

by once requesting AProxy object so I would profit from the easiness of data access using "get" methods and wouldn't be obliged to make looping server requests for every sub-object, sub-sub-objects etc.


Due to specification I should use smth. like  .with("property ref") to get one level of hierarchy 

but what about retrieving following levels of compositions (in my case List <C> for every object B and List<D> for every object C).


Thanks in advance.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7uYQX26ntPIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

XMLHttpRequest2

HI All,
We are trying to write a wrapper over XMLHttpRequest2. Can people
point out if some one has written some part of it already.
@GWT Contributor Whether we have some code already in developer own
trunk?
Warm Regards,
Allahbaksh

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: ProgressBar for GWT 2.3

I have been using this simple css based cell widget progress bar:

http://code.google.com/p/gwt-cell-widgets/source/browse/trunk/GWT-Cell-Widgets-Example/src/com/siderakis/gwt/cellwidgets/client/StatusCell.java

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/k74A97YLE74J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT/GPE 2.4.0 RC1 is available

DataGrid may have a fixed header and footer rows. In CellTable all
rows scroll together.


On Jul 28, 6:40 pm, James Wendel <jmwen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To ask, does the DataGrid differ from CellTable only in the content
> area being scrollable?  Are there are differences I'm not seeing?
>
> Thanks,
> -James
>
> On Jul 27, 12:55 pm, David Chandler <drfibona...@google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > GWT 2.4.0 adds a new DataGrid widget with scrollable data area and
> > many enhancements to RequestFactory (seehttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_4).
>
> > Google Plugin for Eclipse 2.4.0 introduces a wizard to publish your
> > application to Google Apps Marketplace.
>
> > SDK:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list
> > Eclipse update sites:http://code.google.com/eclipse/beta/docs/download.html
>
> > gwt-2.4.0-rc1 will appear in Maven Central shortly. Docs, Javadocs,
> > and release notes will be published with the final release.
>
> > --
> > David Chandler
> > Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE
> > w:http://code.google.com/
> > b:http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/
> > b:http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/
> > t: @googledevtools

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Layout and styling of HorizontalPanel/VerticalPanel

If you use "myPanel" class for a Vertical or Horizontal panel, you can
set the style for <td> elements of these panels directly in the CSS
file:

.myPanel td {
margin: 6px 0;
}

On Jul 28, 8:41 pm, clay <claytonw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "setStyleName" method sets the CSS class of the generated <table>
> element. Is there any way I can set the CSS class of the generated
> <td> elements within the <table>?
>
> What I want to do is add spacing *between* HorizontalPanel/
> VerticalPanel cells but not around the outer edge of the
> HorizontalPanel/VerticalPanel itself. I don't believe you can do this
> at the <table> level in HTML. BTW, the "setSpacing" method sets the
> "cellspacing" attribute of the <table> element which doesn't produce
> the result that I'm looking for.
>
> Also, if I may ask, why does VerticalPanel use <table> rather than
> <div>? It seems to be there should be a Panel layout class that
> generates a sequence of <div> elements, which is a very common layout
> approach in raw HTML.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Re: GWT CSS URL Problem

Try to move MyStyles.css file at projectroot/war/MyStyles.css

Regards,
Ibahim

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:05 AM, clay <claytonwohl@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a CSS stylesheet defined at
       projectroot/src/main/webapp/MyStyles.css
In my module's .gwt.xml file I reference this with:
       <stylesheet src='MyStyles.css'/>

In dev mode, GWT generates the following CSS URL which results in a
404 not found error:
       http://127.0.0.1:8888/module/MyStyles.css
The following URL works (when I try manually):
       http://127.0.0.1:8888/MyStyles.css

In production mode, GWT generates the following CSS URL which results
in a 404 not found error:
       http://localhost:8080/project/module/MyStyles.css
The following URL works (when I try manually):
       http://localhost:8080/project/MyStyles.css

I'm using:

GWT 2.3
Project built with Maven archetype: mvn archetype:generate -
DarchetypeRepository=repo1.maven.org -
DarchetypeGroupId=org.codehaus.mojo -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-maven-
plugin -DarchetypeVersion=2.3.0-1
IntelliJ 10.5.x

What am I doing wrong? How can I resolve this?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Cell Table, Remote Paging Issues


I didn't think of overriding last Page & first Page. Thanks for the pointer.. I shall look into the link.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/S4Q4OUsM4y8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: gwt & python

Hi
You can use python only on server side of a GWT application and then
you will not be able to use RPC mechanism (because of using python on
server side ).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: RequestFactoryEditorDriver example?

Vasily, can you post the updated snippet for PhoneListEditor and related UI code.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/VlHFEGDAeWwJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT 2.2 and gwt-maps.jar not compatible

Thanks Alexander Bertram

On Jul 29, 7:46 am, Alexander Bertram <a...@bedatadriven.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 3:20 am, André Nunes <an...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, how i can rebuild gwt-maps ?? I using gwt 2.3, what version of gwt-maps i
> > should use ?
> > tkxs !
>
> I had the same issue, you can download from here:
> You can download it fromhttp://nexus.bedatadriven.com/content/repositories/thirdparty/com/goo...
>
> If you use maven/ivy you can add it so:
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>com.google.gwt.google-apis</groupId>
>             <artifactId>gwt-maps</artifactId>
>             <version>1.1.0</version>
>             <classifier>gwt23</classifier>
>             <scope>provided</scope>
>         </dependency>
>
>    <repositories>
>         <repository>
>             <id>bedatadriven-public</id>
>             <name>Bedatadriven Public Repo</name>
>             <url>http://nexus.bedatadriven.com/content/groups/public</
> url>
>             <snapshots>
>                 <enabled>true</enabled>
>             </snapshots>
>         </repository>
>     </repositories>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth

>>..... figuring it out on your own.....
 
Just an observation:

Google is a pathless land.  It is not a highway.

Most of the time, companies build highway and developers just follow the users guide and build applications to fit on that highway.
Development will be much easier and simpler; but creativity and innovations are limited by the width and breadth of the highway.
Moreover, all applications may look similar; may be on different flavors.
Many vehicles are on the highway;
Flavors may be different; sports vehicle; hybrid; bike, van, suv, limo, truck and bus.
But all are just vehicles.

In a pathless land, developers have total and complete freedom.
No boundary. It is a pathless land.
You build totally new and fresh applications.

Figuring it out on your own - gives you total and complete freedom.
Come up with creative and innovative idea.
Identify the API and try to use them;
If the current API doesn't meet your requirements, ask for new API;
Google may build it for you.

Again, Google is a pathless land.
Enjoy the total and complete freedom.

Regards,
Bala

 

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:
For Aidan O'Kelly -I just got back from that thing and I couldn't wait to go through this email slowly. I think the main points of this email should be posted on the getting started sites of  App Engine and GWT - its brilliant, I mean I can't explain to you how perfect this is for me, you have surely saved me time. Thanks - I am serious,

" Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end."

I needed that, I can't wait to get into it, it makes perfect sense too, my client-side code is done and what I want to do is use the app engine server-side. Now stop me if I am wrong, lets say I want to use only google technology, cause it rocks and its free, and I want to create a rich client-side UI that communicates with "the cloud" - and I mean "google's cloud" - then I want to use the GWT and the App Engine together like described above? If this is the case, then i feel there ought to be more on the joining of the two in the Tutorials - like a Advanced Tutorial. However, I rather like the idea of figuring it out on my own as you also described in your email, I am sure to learn more and for me that is what it is all about, but you definitely set me in the right direction. Peace.



On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that thereIf 

are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for
tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API
documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology.

You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very
separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java
runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java
to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language,
but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end.

I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear
idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can &
can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects
that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to
get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any
other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them
in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of
software)

Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at
the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you
really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google
Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated
to get right.

Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol
Specs  are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a
specific case.
Good luck,
Aidan




On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without
> the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine
> apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and
> documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google
> App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I
> cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT.
>
> I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on
> OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with
> GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I
> apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the
> GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work
> together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes
> writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App
> Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the
> two together.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth

For Aidan O'Kelly -I just got back from that thing and I couldn't wait to go through this email slowly. I think the main points of this email should be posted on the getting started sites of  App Engine and GWT - its brilliant, I mean I can't explain to you how perfect this is for me, you have surely saved me time. Thanks - I am serious,

" Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end."

I needed that, I can't wait to get into it, it makes perfect sense too, my client-side code is done and what I want to do is use the app engine server-side. Now stop me if I am wrong, lets say I want to use only google technology, cause it rocks and its free, and I want to create a rich client-side UI that communicates with "the cloud" - and I mean "google's cloud" - then I want to use the GWT and the App Engine together like described above? If this is the case, then i feel there ought to be more on the joining of the two in the Tutorials - like a Advanced Tutorial. However, I rather like the idea of figuring it out on my own as you also described in your email, I am sure to learn more and for me that is what it is all about, but you definitely set me in the right direction. Peace.



On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that thereIf 
are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for
tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API
documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology.

You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very
separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java
runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java
to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language,
but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end.

I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear
idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can &
can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects
that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to
get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any
other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them
in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of
software)

Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at
the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you
really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google
Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated
to get right.

Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol
Specs  are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a
specific case.
Good luck,
Aidan




On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without
> the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine
> apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and
> documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google
> App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I
> cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT.
>
> I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on
> OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with
> GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I
> apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the
> GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work
> together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes
> writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App
> Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the
> two together.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format?

Kurtt,

What's your situation with IE6? Do you develop software for corporate
users who refuse to upgrade?

Did you look at the other links? Google posted that note about IE6
more than a year and a half ago, and Microsoft is literally begging
people to stop using IE6.

http://www.ie6countdown.com/

This story is just funny:

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/07/29/internet.explorer.dumb/

On Jul 30, 5:22 am, Kurtt <kurtt....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, my bad, I've known about the png problem under IE6. Thanks a
> million for your reply !
> :-)
>
> On Jul 30, 2:21 pm, Jim Douglas <jdou...@basis.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa...
>
> >http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-launches-anti-marketing-camp...
>
> >http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2010/01/modern-browsers-for-mode...
>
> > On Jul 29, 11:01 pm, Kurtt <kurtt....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In the section "Image Sprites" of this doc(http://code.google.com/
> > > webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClientBundle.html#ImageResource), Google
> > > says:
>
> > > =============================
>
> > > Support for IE6 isn't feasible in this format, because structural
> > > changes to the DOM are necessary to implement a "windowing" effect.
> > > Once it's possible to distinguish ie6 and ie7 in user.agent, we could
> > > revisit support for ie6. In the current implementation, the ie6 code
> > > won't render correctly, although is a purely cosmetic issue.
>
> > > =============================
>
> > > How do i understand why IE6 couldn't be supported? Does IE itself not
> > > support CSS sprite? Does this mean I won't benefit from GWT's image
> > > sprite feature if I want my application to run well on IE6?
> > > Any reply will be appreciated.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Celltable & Cell Grouping (Rowspan, Colspan)

Just found the answer.

http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10476


On 31 Jul., 00:13, "P.G.Taboada" <pgtabo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any tips on how to implement this?
>
> brgds.
>
> Papick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Celltable & Cell Grouping (Rowspan, Colspan)

Hi,

any tips on how to implement this?

brgds.

Papick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/CfRqwR3K7E0J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth

This open source book can also help you.


It is not up to date, it's on my todo list to update it and contribute to it by the end of october.

Cheers,

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:
wow, thanks a lot for all that, I got to head out so I can't digest atm but the sheer volume of advise here is incredible, gtg but Im gonna write back later. thanks


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there
are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for
tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API
documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology.

You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very
separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java
runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java
to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language,
but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end.

I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear
idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can &
can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects
that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to
get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any
other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them
in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of
software)

Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at
the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you
really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google
Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated
to get right.

Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol
Specs  are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a
specific case.
Good luck,
Aidan




On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without
> the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine
> apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and
> documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google
> App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I
> cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT.
>
> I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on
> OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with
> GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I
> apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the
> GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work
> together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes
> writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App
> Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the
> two together.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



--
Christian Goudreau

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth

wow, thanks a lot for all that, I got to head out so I can't digest atm but the sheer volume of advise here is incredible, gtg but Im gonna write back later. thanks


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there
are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for
tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API
documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology.

You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very
separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java
runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java
to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language,
but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
 What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end.

I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear
idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can &
can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects
that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to
get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any
other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them
in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of
software)

Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at
the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you
really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google
Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated
to get right.

Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol
Specs  are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a
specific case.
Good luck,
Aidan




On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without
> the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine
> apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and
> documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google
> App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I
> cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT.
>
> I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on
> OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with
> GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I
> apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the
> GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work
> together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes
> writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App
> Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the
> two together.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Google Code Tutorials and Documentation - GWT OAuth

Well, if you've reached a point where you want to do stuff, that there
are no step-by-step tutorials for, you need to stop looking for
tutorials, and starting looking at reference material, ie, API
documentation, or documents/tutorials/papers on a specific technology.

You've touched upon it in your post, but GWT and App Engine are very
separate, and very different things. That the App Engine has a Java
runtime for you to run server-side code in, and that GWT compiles Java
to client-side code, is convenient, in that you stay in one language,
but that's all. Now, they DO make a good match, as they are both very
good at what they do (GWT on client-side, App-Engine on server-side)
but they are very different beasts, so you can't really 'apply
app-engine tutorials to GWT'.
What you can do is, use them on App Engine, and then use the result
to power your GWT app. You might want to read up on the HTTP protocol,
Web Services / REST architecture, if you haven't already, as these are
the core protocols used to make your GWT app talk to your App Engine
back-end.

I'm pretty sure you understand that, but its important to have a clear
idea of your 'software stack'. What each component is, what it can &
can't do, what its responsible for. Perhaps make some toy projects
that only use App Engine(serving up static HTML), or only use GWT, to
get a better idea of where the separation is. (This works for any
other components/libraries you add later, it can be good to test them
in isolation before using them in tandem with other pieces of
software)

Just a quick note on OpenID.. I dont know it that well, I looked at
the specs a few years ago, and will be again soon, but unless you
really really need it, its probably best to stick with the Google
Authentication API at first, as its stable and a LOT less complicated
to get right.

Hope this helps, my main point is, API References/User Guides/Protocol
Specs are your friends, when no-one has made a tutorial for a
specific case.
Good luck,
Aidan


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Cote <mcjavalearner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am sure there are numerous reasons why you would use the GWT without
> the app engine, but I am primarily interested in writing app engine
> apps with the GWT - there is a annoying division of tutorials and
> documentation regarding GWT and the Google App Engine. In the Google
> App Engine site there are tutorials for OpenID, OAuth, and the like, I
> cannot find a decent step by step tutorial for using OpenID with GWT.
>
> I would really like to see more tutorials for the GWT - especially on
> OpenID, but also - how to play audio, how to use the data store with
> GWT, Single Sign-On, etc I guess what it comes down to is - How can I
> apply the tutorials in App Engine Documentation to the GWT? Can the
> GWT or App Engine doc site include an explanation of how the two work
> together or how they relate - I want to use the GWT because it makes
> writing client-side code very easy for me, I want to use the App
> Engine because it makes deployment very easy for me. I want to use the
> two together.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?

I posted a message about this recently, and was pointed to the bug
referenced by Brian below.

Currently you do need to have getters in order for AutoBean to know
the property exists.

Ryan

On Jul 30, 11:44 am, Brian Reilly <brian.irei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is a known bug. I saw it mentioned recently and thought that
> there was a new issue filed, however I couldn't find it. I did however find
> this older issue:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5760
>
> that appears to be related.
>
> -- Brian
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Romain BIARD <biard.rom...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method
> > "find" located in my ServerSide Entity.
> > Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter.
>
> > But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I
> > decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on
> > *.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for.
>
> > But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm
> > facing a RuntimeException:
>
> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey
> >    at
>
> > com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(Au toBeanCodexImpl.java:
> > 524)
> >    at
>
> > com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(Ab stractAutoBean.java:
> > 276)
>
> > I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage
> > any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared.
>
> > Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ???
>
> > If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented.
> > Anybody in this case ?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: ERROR: GWT 2.3 + gwt-maps

Hi, i prefer to use a official api v3, because i've a book that
explain very much the new things of this version. For use this annex,
I need to add this .jar in external jars in build path, and wich
inherits, script, or other things I need to add in .xml module ?
Can you explain this steps, that are before the compile time ? Because
use GWT, Google Maps, Eclipse, all this I've a knowledge, but doesn't
compile Gmaps.jar .
I really appreciate your help, and sorry for my bad english.

On 28 jul, 03:24, Bin Wu <b...@bluepoint.net.au> wrote:
> Qual biblioteca você realmente quer usar? O oficial do Google gwt-maps api
> ou a lib do 3o partido a partir dehttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-maps-v3/?
>
> A lib do 3o partido apóia GMaps versão 3, mas já foi preterido por um
> ano. Então eu não sei muito sobre ele.
>
> O oficial do Google api parece suportar apenas mapas versão 2. Eu chequei o
> fonte e compilado com GWT2.3, até agora tudo que eu preciso só funciona bem. Eu
> junto em anexo o jar lib com este post. Ver se isso ajuda.
>
> 2011/7/27 André Nunes <an...@ hotmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Oi, eu usando GWT 2.3 com gwt-maps.jar, mas eu tenho problemas, não
> > Compilação, mas eu sigo todos os passos que guia.
>
> > Uma parte dos problemas estão listados abaixo:
>
> > [ERROR] Erros em 'jar: file: / C: / eclipse/gwt-maps-1.1.0/gwt-
> > Maps3-0.2a.jar! / Com / google / gwt / maps / cliente / base / LatLng.java '
> > [ERROR] Erro interno do compilador
> > Java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: interface encontrado
> > Com.google.gwt.core.ext.typeinfo.JClassType, mas a classe era esperado
> > Em
>
> > Com.google.gwt.jsio.rebind.JSWrapperGenerator.generate (JSWrapperGenerator.j ava:
> > 276)
> > Em
>
> > Com.google.gwt.core.ext.GeneratorExtWrapper.generate (GeneratorExtWrapper.ja va:
> > 48)
>
> > Alguém pode me ajudar?
>
> > -
> > Você recebeu esta mensagem porque está inscrito para o Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" grupo.
> > Para postar neste grupo, envie um e-mail para google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > Para sair deste grupo, envie um email para
> > Google-web-toolkit + unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > Para mais opções, visite este grupo em
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>
>
> gwt-maps.jar
> 995KExibirdownload

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: gwt & python

its called pyjamas

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/dLmcKl-n4QoJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?

I think this is a known bug. I saw it mentioned recently and thought that there was a new issue filed, however I couldn't find it. I did however find this older issue:


that appears to be related.

-- Brian


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Romain BIARD <biard.romain@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method
"find" located in my ServerSide Entity.
Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter.

But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I
decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on
*.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for.

But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm
facing a RuntimeException:

Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey
   at
com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java:
524)
   at
com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(AbstractAutoBean.java:
276)

I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage
any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared.

Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ???

If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented.
Anybody in this case ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: GWT Page flows - want to start a open source project - thoughts

Note that the current build is for GWT <= 2.1. If you're using 2.2+, currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself.

I did some work a couple of months ago to create a jar that would work for any version of GWT, but haven't committed it yet. In fact, that's the only reason I hadn't already mentioned gwt-multipage in this thread. Now that it has been mentioned, I'll make sure I commit my changes this weekend, at least on a branch.

BTW, the project page is http://gwtmultipage.org/, and the google code page is http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/.


-- Brian


On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Aidan O'Kelly <aidanok@gmail.com> wrote:
There is this,

http://claudiushauptmann.com/a-framework-for-gwt-multipage-applications.html

Which might be of interest to you.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:00 PM, dreamer <venugopal.vasireddy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start a new opensource project - "GWT page flows" - similar
> to struts.
>
> With my moderate GWT knowledge, I did not find any way to weave
> application with pages, though components are there.
>
> Not all ajax applications are single page apps.
>
> Here are my thoughts from very high level  -
> ===================================================
> Use composites (widgets) as pages - build using designer.
> Weave all these pages with the help of something like "struts-
> config.xml".
> ======================================================
> It would have been great if GWT compilation is component by component
> more transparently. Some thing under the hood is happening on these
> lines. Even loading javascript into browser would have happened page
> by page, only when it is needed.
>
>
> Few questions:
>
> Is it possible to build page flow on the above lines using GWT as is?
> Are these features available in any other form, that I did not
> realize? (UiBinder seems slightly different than I want)
>
> Just I would like to brainstorm. Please share your thoughts.
> - venu
> -  http://schoolk12.appspot.com/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

ValueProxy Implementation Rule ?

Hi all,

I'm using valueProxies in order to give Criterias to a static method
"find" located in my ServerSide Entity.
Each ValueProxy had a setter and a getter.

But today I realized that only setter had to be used Client side so I
decided to remove all the getters on the Proxy but let them on
*.shared POJO which my proxy is a valueProxy for.

But It don't seems to work. The application is still compling but I'm
facing a RuntimeException:

Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: searchKey
at
com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AutoBeanCodexImpl.doCoderFor(AutoBeanCodexImpl.java:
524)
at
com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.AbstractAutoBean.setProperty(AbstractAutoBean.java:
276)

I didn't understand why but I suppose that RequestFactory don't manage
any ValueProxies without getters AND setters declared.

Maybe it has to call getters when object are created Server Side ???

If it is true, maybe this implementation rule should be documented.
Anybody in this case ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.