I would be happy to implement the support for MapS.
Anyclue i should start looking at for this implementation? where
should it be contributed to.
Thanks.
On 13 juil, 17:59, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:48:27 PM UTC+2, frog wrote:
>
> > Hi
>
> > Dev guides say that RF supported collection types are Set and List
> > Is there a way to get around RF this limitation? What do you do if an
> > entity contains a map?
>
> Send a List of "pairs" (make a ValueProxy for that) instead, representing
> the Map#entrySet() (I've seen bugs reported about Sets of proxies, so you'd
> better use a List).
> Map will be supported in due time, as it's already supported at the AutoBean
> level AFAIK.
>
> …or you could contribute the Map support if you really need it and would
> better spend time building it than working around it ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
ReplyDeletekanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees
kanchipuram silk sarees