I would be happy to implement the support for MapS.
Anyclue i should start looking at for this implementation? where
should it be contributed to.
On 13 juil, 17:59, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 7:48:27 PM UTC+2, frog wrote:
> > Hi
> > Dev guides say that RF supported collection types are Set and List
> > Is there a way to get around RF this limitation? What do you do if an
> > entity contains a map?
> Send a List of "pairs" (make a ValueProxy for that) instead, representing
> the Map#entrySet() (I've seen bugs reported about Sets of proxies, so you'd
> better use a List).
> Map will be supported in due time, as it's already supported at the AutoBean
> level AFAIK.
> …or you could contribute the Map support if you really need it and would
> better spend time building it than working around it ;-)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Post a Comment