GWT features a history mechanism which could solve the first question:
provide info on that: rather than using a file path, you'd use #....
(an identifier after a hash). Many AJAX apps work that way to prevent
GWT is quite powerful concerning internationalization using property
files (you delcare an interface and provide a property file and bind
it together using the GWT class)
Concerning in-place editing, there is surely a way; Google wave is
implemented in GWT and also features rich editing features.
Finally, there is a gears binding for GWT (http://code.google.com/p/
gwt-google-apis/) which you can use for offline storage (modern
browser or plugin required).
Hope this helps...
On 30 Jul., 13:41, "A.Augustini" <alessandro.august...@googlemail.com>
> [**Republished to get rid of ugly line-break cluttering**]
> Dear GWT Community members:
> As GWT newbie I'm currently evaluating GWT for some potential future
> projects. After reading available introductory materials, I'm now
> wondering if GWT is the appropriate candidate for my specific app
> Obviously there are 2 basic GWT app dev styles:
> (1) "desktop-app setup":
> one GWT module on one almost empty "carrier" HTML page.
> (2) "traditional-web setup":
> several traditional HTML pages with some GWT widgets.
> Supposing this is correct: What would be the ideal GWT app
> architecture for the following, "more hybrid" scenerio?
> Say we've to build a kind of "Mini Online Site Builder" with some
> simple CMS functionality and basically consisting of 2 main
> requirements for 2 available enduser roles:
> (A) 'SiteAdmins' have secured access to an 'AdminConsole' where they
> dynamically *compose/edit*, *preview* and publish 'WebSites'
> -- AdminConsole thus supporting "2 work modes": Edit & Preview!
> - 'WebSites' are all published under a common base URL plus
> admin-specified relative site path.
> - 'WebSites' consist of 'Pages', probably associated to a
> default 'MasterPage' and default "Theme".
> - 'Page' may have own 'MasterPage' and 'Theme'.
> - 'MasterPage' is composed of typed 'PageRegions'
> (e.g. Header-/FooterRegion, NavRegion, ContentRegion, ...)
> - 'PageRegion' has list of 'Content' elements of some
> 'ContentType' that is permissible with that region's type.
> ContentTypes could be: TextParagraph, HTMLParagraph,
> ImagedTextParagraph, Image, Table, Form/Survey, etc.
> - SiteAdmins would have some advanced widgets to define complex
> domain content elements, e.g. spreadsheets, price tables, ..
> (=> good candiate for GWT)
> (B) 'Users' visit the resulting web sites through site-specific URL
> - navigate back and forth and may submit some public or authen-
> tication-requiring ordering/posting forms.
> - User experience should be the traditional (!) web site UX
> (=>good candidate for JSF instead of GWT(?))
> Obviously, the AdminConsole impl is a good candidate for a pure GWT
> module (see (1) above) whereas I rather would choose pattern (2)
> for the web site renderings -- the above-mentioned "hybridity".
> Now, I need some experts' advice in the following topics:
> 1. Is GWT suitable for "mimicking" traditional web pages within a
> GWT widget pane, i.e. where users can navigate through pages
> via several seo-friendly URLs (or just one(?))?
> I guess *client-side* logic would download the site/page
> representation via GWT-RPC and dynamically render it on the
> client, BUT ...
> ...How can the *inter-page navigation* via bookmarkable URLs
> be realized???
> => Could I still have bookmarkable URLs like
> "www.acme.com/site1/about-us" working correctly in my
> 2. Where would I place the page interpretation/rendering logic, and
> what would be its output format?
> 3. How would I realize the *preview* and *edit* modes in the
> I suppose an "in-place edit strategy" would be optimal, where the
> page preview is visible and only the active section panel gets
> decorated with edit/save buttons -- thus avoiding separate
> read-only and read-write views.
> 4. Is there a client-side storage mechanism to temporarily save
> current WebSite definition entities?
> If so, is there a size limitation for this storage?
> In my current situation, I would highly appreciate any realization
> hints. Thank you very much in advance.
> Best regards,
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to email@example.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Post a Comment