Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

Hi Thomas

Lets forget about java.util, what about simple arrays ? 

It seems that we already have java [] array -> JS Array marshalling. 

And It would be very nice if we had these type of marshalling with zero performance penalty:

 java byte[] -> Int8ArrayNative

 java short[] -> Int16ArrayNative

 java float[] -> FloatArrayNative

Currently, there is no way of writing GWT compatible portable code that operates with  byte[] short[] int[] float[] without java array[] -> JS TypedArray performance issues

-K

On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 10:27:58 AM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote:

Except that there is NO marshaling! There are so many cases where it just won't work that it's not even worth trying if you ask me.You

 need to think about isNative vs. "exported" types, method return values vs. parameters vs. fields (which can be both get and set); object identities (calling the getter twice in your example, should it return the same "wrapper" instance? I can already see people complain if that's not the case)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.