Re: Overuse of "AssumedStale" Issue Tag

@Ed

I really hope you are right... but so far I've had the same feelings of Mauro and David

I guess some discouragement/vexation could be avoided adding an explanatory comment before or contextually tagging an issue as AssumedStale, and especially avoid stating

I spent more than half an hour reading the code and the specs and doing tests. We can't realistically spend as many time on each and every opened issue. 

That really makes me wonder...

On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 9:50:15 AM UTC+2, Ed wrote:

@David, @Mauro,

I am surprised and disappointed by your reactions.

My reaction on this all:

Please be positive and not so negative. Clearly your glass is half empty and mine is half full (and I am using GWT for about 7 years now)...

Please follow the GWT news, G+ GWT posts, Ray Google 2013 GWT session, the issues being solved blazing fasts currently..., the contributor forum, etc...

I am sure that if you follow these sources, your glass will be half full as well. If not, please see a doctor ;)...

@David: your list of negative points is incorrect as I am building huge gwt projects and don't have this experience of 80% of your issues. So you might want to consider refactoring/reviewing your code/GWT usage.

GWT had a tough year putting all pieces in place, but I think things look very promising which they  are showing if you follow the above sources...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.