Re: Implementing Normal HTML Instead of GWT

Manuel said:
> . are you planning to send this to gwt?
> . to play with this code, do I have to download the entire kit or may I
> patch just some classes?
> . does it work with 2.5.

I plan to merge 2.5 once it's released. I expect it'll work, though
there might be trade offs. We absolutely need the BFCache for our app
because it runs cross-page. So we'd override anything that was
incompatible, if we had to.

If you need to patch it across to the RC meantime, here are the diffs:
http://zelea.com/var/db/repo/gwt/

If anyone else finds it useful, we can look at sending it upstream.

--
Michael Allan

Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/


Manuel Carrasco Moñino said:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Michael Allan <mike@zelea.com> wrote:
>
> > Manuel Carrasco Moñino said:
> > > ... basically a gwt app is a javascript inside an html, ... so when
> > > you change to other html [page], your app is unloaded from memory
> > > and you have to load it in the new html [page].
> >
> > If anyone needs to avoid page unloading, here's a branch of GWT with
> > limited support for the BFCache (rapid back-and-forth navigation):
> > http://zelea.com/project/gwt/
>
>
> Michael, Interesting stuff, a couple of cuestions:
> . are you planning to send this to gwt?
> . to play with this code, do I have to download the entire kit or may I
> patch just some classes?
> . does it work with 2.5.
>
> - Manolo

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.