SmartGWT has an extensive subsystem for interacting directly with WSDL web services from the browser. Some samples here:
This is all part of the free LGPL product, assuming you don't need a server-side proxy or can handle your own proxying.
Specifically for WSDL there is nothing really comparable for plain GWT, or for GXT that I can find. You'll see people recommended contacting WSDL services from the server side:
More generally, Alfredo gave a fairly balanced view: it depends on how demanding your requirements are. If you need to do everything that SmartGWT grids can do, or even just a few key features (like say, freeze columns on the fly + inline filtering) you are years of R&D away from that if you start with plain GWT. We know because we did the R&D :) This is true even if you use incubator functionality.
On Monday, October 29, 2012 2:47:08 AM UTC-7, kumar thatikonda wrote:
Hi All,Can you please let me know which of the option( GWT or SmartGWT) is better, considering the below scenario.1. Will be used for designing screens and client-side validations.2. Performance ( page loading , grid loading) should be good.3. Need to communicate with server through wsdls(web services.)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/xSnb4UeByzcJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment