Re: Does a private variable in Java stays private when compiled to javascript?

Altough that looks something worth using in some future project for
now I don't need to make a JS-lib all I need is an API usable only on
my website, and that I'll make with JSNI.

so thanks everyone for your help but I'll stay with JSNI.

On 26 יוני, 02:07, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 juin, 19:40, Stefan Bachert <stefanbach...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi Shedokan,
>
> > I think this approach will fail.
>
> > a) you can't give you code away. Because GWT needs the source.
> > b) to use GWT code as JavaScript-lib fails. GWT compiles only what is
> > needed. So how could you be sure, that ALL code comes in the
> > JavaScript?
> > c) ANd when you even achieve this, your JavaScript-Size is larger then
> > need becauses the GWT-App needs just 10%
>
> Have a look at how GWT-Exporter is used with Timepedia's Chronoscope:http://timepedia.org/chronoscope/
> You obviously download much unneeded code most of the time (depending
> on your use of the API), but at least you can code in Java/GWT and
> publish a re-usable JS-only lib.
> People using GWT will of course benefit from using the Chronoscope GWT
> code directly.
>
> @Shedokan: you should really give GWT-Exporter a try. It does what
> you'd be able to do in JSNI, but does it automagically based on
> annotations you put on your classes.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.