but as i mentioned before - the (tab)-layout isn't my main concern: my main problem is how do i map/use those activities,places,views. most example suggest 1:1:1 releationship. also the interfaces imply this: the start method of activity "acceptsOneWidget" (i know this could be ignored by simply create a compisite widget and return/ show this one - but is this the intended use?). Examples for activityMapper (and the Interfaces**) accept a place and return one activity.
but 1:1:1 would mean that each display area is a view "presented" by one activity started/bound ton one place. but this conflicts with my (current) understanding of places and activities. my understanding is that a place could start/bound to n(>=1) activities, each activity could controll/present m(>=n) views.
my question is: is this contradiction a problem of my understanding or a problem with examples and some interfaces delivered with places/activities? (or probably an problem of my understanding of the interfacess**)
**
AppActivityMapper implements ActivityMapper
...
@Override---------------------------
public Activity getActivity(Place place)
...HelloActivity extends AbstractActivity......
@Override
public void start(AcceptsOneWidget containerWidget, EventBus eventBus) {
HelloView helloView = clientFactory.getHelloView();
helloView.setName(name);
helloView.setPresenter(this);
containerWidget.setWidget(helloView.asWidget());
}
...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment