Re: is ZK better than GWT..?

HI akhil,

ZK does not have a 2nd compilation step into JS (and can thus use all
of Java on both sides). However, you have ongoing client-server
communication (speed!), you don't have the optimizations google offers
for your and from what I remember from using ZK, the framework is by
far not as straightforward: with GWT, you add a widget to a root panel
and just program the UI; with ZK, you have binding declarations,
event / update issues, ... At least I (but it may be me) had much
more trouble and many more problems to solve before the ZK logic was
in place (e.g. augment table contents). Finally, you re-use the best
practices long established in "traditional" UI programming and this is
where RIA also aims for when using GWT.

So for a quick and optimized entry into the subject of RIA - and also
for quickly implementing larger stuff with a stable framework, I'd use
GWT. I've been using it for a while now and it turned out to be a very
solid ground. (Maybe ZK would have done the same when I'd have
followed it further - all starting issues can surely be solved there
as well; however, I've never regretted choosing GWT).

Hope this helps - best Regards
Sebastian

On 31 Jul., 12:37, matthieu vidal <m...@matthieu-vidal.com> wrote:
> Regarding the ZK license and the community arround it, I don't think.
>
> On 31 juil, 07:41, akhil <shastri.ak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > pls help me to decide  isZK
>
> > ZK better than GWT..?
>
> > Regards,
> > Akhil

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.