Le vendredi 1 juillet 2011 18:12:45 UTC+2, cri a écrit :
First, someone definitely *thought initially* that Views/ClientFactory/
Activities/Places/PlaceHistoryMapper/ ActivityMapper described on the
GWT *MVP* documentation page constituted a framework that could be
*used* at least for MVP. And, indeed, it can be.
Secondly, to me and some others I'd guess, it seems superior in terms
of effort required than what is described in the "Part I and II"
articles. We have a number of people here that have used both and
there is agreement on this. However, I'm sure there are some relevant
pros and cons.
That's because all of them talk about history management, not only MVP. The *MVP* part is only the View/Display interface and the handlers vs. the Presenter/Delegate interface (people use different names for similar those things); everything else is not part of the MVP *pattern*.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/j5fCwn2s-UEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment