Re: View-Presenter Interaction Patterns in Google Web Toolkit (GWT)

hello, thanks for sharing this. I am having some challenge with its
implementation though(using the Ray Ryan's method). How do I use the
go() method to serve multiple views if its local type is of
HasWidgets?

On 3/1/11, Erik Bens <benserik@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> perfect overview - thanks! I already worked with this architecture and
> have to say it is very easy to handle after some tests. Additionally
> use GIN for binding Views and Presenters will makes it easier too.
> One question: Is this architecture also possible with the new
> activity / places approach? Does someone has a diagram / sample for
> it?
>
> Erik
>
> On Mar 1, 6:43 pm, Brian Reilly <brian.irei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Very good article! Thank you for contributing it!
>>
>> I would be interested to hear from creators/users of the MVP
>> frameworks out there (gwt-mvp, gwt-platform, gwt-presenter, mvp4g,
>> etc.) about which approach is used in each of the frameworks or if the
>> frameworks are approach-agnostic.
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Wiseman
>>
>> <geoffrey.wise...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > If you're using Model-View-Presenter with GWT (or you're thinking
>> > about it), there are a number of different patterns you can use to co-
>> > ordinate between your view and the corresponding presenter. Ray Ryan's
>> > "Best Practices for Architecting your GWT App" at I/O 2009 showed off
>> > one pattern, Daniel Danilatos refined that for his "GWT Testing Best
>> > Practices" presentation during I/O 2010, and a third pattern was used
>> > in the "Large-Scale Application Development and MVP" article in the
>> > GWT wiki.  Using these and my own experiences with these patterns,
>> > I've taken a small example, demonstrated how to apply each of these
>> > patterns to that example, and written up some of the advantages and
>> > disadvantages.
>>
>> >http://blog.codiform.com/2011/03/view-presenter-interaction-patterns-...
>>
>> > These patterns are by and large available already in the sources
>> > above, but by bringing them together and talking about some of the
>> > pros and cos, I hope to save some people some of the sorts of
>> > experimentation that many of us will have already gone through to
>> > decide which one of these patterns works best for us.
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to
>> > google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

--
Odeyemi 'Kayode O.

B.Sc(Hons) Econs, Application Developer & Systems Engineer (Sun Certified
Professional),
Oracle Certified Associate, Solaris Systems Administrator, Drupal Developer

Website: http://sinati.com <http://www.sinati.com>
Socialize with me: http://profile.to/charyorde, http://twitter.com/charyorde,

http://www.google.com/profiles/dreyemi
Skype:drecute

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.