Re: why not use bytecode?

There are many online decompilers. The big problem I see is that in most cases I don't want my code decompiled. The entire purpose of this instead of HTML5 is so that my code cannot be reproduced unless I open source it.

Also, if someone really wants a bytecode to js compiler, they can make one. I for one think that GWT is extremely helpful as is.

On Monday, May 19, 2008 at 6:59:23 AM UTC-4, Axel Kittenberger wrote:

I don't think defered binding would be affected by this, would it?
Since the compiler could still chose which bytecode version to take...

I know the decompiler approach works right now. (@hint at original
poster ;-)  Would be an interesting experiment how 1) "classic java
compile" with optimization turned on 2) decompile 3) GWT compile,
affects performance/size of code. Unfortunally have no time right now,
I looked a bit into java decompilers, but this is a huge mess :
( (either non-free, or packed with GUI, or created in some OS
dependend non-java environment, etc. None of those I looked at I would
consider good, so this needs a hack on this end too, taking a
OpenSourced decompiler and turn it into something usefull..)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.