Re: Future of GWT survey

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Cool, thanks for the pointer. I knew about Xtend, but didn't put see
the implications of its compiling to Java for GWT development.

I'm quite happy with Scala in general, but something statically-typed
and less verbose than Java would be very welcome for GWT work.

On 09/20/2012 09:54 PM, RonS wrote:
> Sounds like you're set with Scala, but another advanced JVM
> language option is XTend (http://www.eclipse.org/xtend/).
>
> They recently added GWT support:
> http://blog.efftinge.de/2012/08/gwt-programming-with-xtend.html
> <http://blog.efftinge.de/2012/08/gwt-programming-with-xtend.html>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 20, 2012 1:23:06 PM UTC-5, Clint Gilbert
> wrote:
>
> I would /love/ to be able to use a language other than Java - in
> particular, Scala - for GWT development. On my project, we use
> Scala for all our other JVM work, and it's been a massive
> boilerplate killer, plus easily graspable by
> curious-but-merely-mortal developers like me.
>
> The folks here: http://scalagwt.github.com/ have a working
> prototype, but the last I heard, they needed to submit a patch
> upstream to GWT. (Or maybe their patch needed to be accepted, I
> don't know.)
>
> I like GWT quite a lot, and would not make a dynamic web UI
> without it, but the biggest drag is having to go back to Java.
>
> On 09/19/2012 09:23 AM, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
>> What is your opinion on the future of GWT? How should GWT
>> develop? What technologies should it better support? ...
>
>> We all would like to get answers to these questions, right? To
>> do so, we created survey with help of Ray Cromwell, Artur
>> Signell, Mike Brock, David Chandler, Daniel Kurka and Bhaskar
>> Janakiraman.
>
>> If you want to help finding the best direction for GWT, please
>> fill the survey at: http://bit.ly/GWT2012 (it will take just 10
>> minutes)
>
>> When the results are collected, the will share the information
>> with you.
>
>> - Joonas @ Vaadin
>
>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this
>> discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/i8aXw78yueQJ
>
>>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/i8aXw78yueQJ>.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> google-we...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group,
>> send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en>.
>
>
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion
> on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/nHUat9IKTUsJ.
> To post to this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this
> group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options,
> visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBcrzoACgkQ5IyIbnMUeTvt+wCeNNJTTUHxPX+sbClsVa+/OzeO
tNAAn3h1KY3mMSHTCPUtadE0xCbz4Svl
=WcsT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.