> I have seen this page before. Where did you see that google requires #! (vs plain #) in its new scheme?
Where can I find the new scheme details ?
Where can I find the new scheme details ?
I find it hard to find the exact details, often you will find the old details.
I notice in the Google Webmaster tools that the ur's with the # url fragment aren't indexed, which is also mentioned in the following article: https://www.deepcrawl.com/knowledge/best-practice/guide-to-url-design/
So I am thinking about using #! instead of # and see what happens, or using the History.pushState() (I not support IE 9 anyway), as I get the idea that these url's (created with the pushState()), can be indexed by Google. But I am not sure.
What do you think? Are your ur's with the # fragment indexed by Google?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment