Aw: what kind of MVP to use, what is "current" best practice

Thx to all of you, confusion is disappearing (slowly) :-)
So the bottom line is: a good practice would be to use MVP ("part2" -Way) in conjunction with "places and activities"(mainly for history management - ignoring history management of "part1" - but also as a more abstract kind of presenter(activity part)) ?

Is it possible (or probably preferable) to "aid" the implementation of MVP by a MVP-Framework (like those mentioned above)? or would this raise some conflicts with gwt's places and ativities?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.