Aw: Re: what kind of MVP to use, what is "current" best practice

my confusion is raising?! (did someone read my "answer"? i kindly ask that someone may pay attention to it)
thomas i don't know if i understand the relation (i it exists) between MVP and places and activitie? "It'd be in most case a brad practice..." does this mean that is bad practice if places and activities don't have an relation to MVP in an given application? (and how does this relate to " Activities however are in no way related to MVP"?).
at the moment i see an activity as an 3rd place to put logic in: "part1" says put all logic in presenter, "part2" says at some (use) cases logic in view is ok(is this: gwt discussion such a use case?), jens and thomas say history/state logic could be sperated from presenter and put into activity ??
(besides how good is the the history handling of part1 ? is "at least" this part out of date and it is better to use places and activities?)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.