Saturday, October 26, 2013

Re: Thoughts on GWT 3.0 re: Java 8 and IE 8/9

Ray, sounds fantastic and can happily say that something along those lines would tackle many of the issues with GWT I noted in the current GWT survey. Will be eagerly awaiting the design docs and proposals.


On 26 October 2013 00:06, Ed <post2edbras@gmail.com> wrote:
We're thinking about introducing a way of developing UI that is more like traditional HTML design, you create HTML, CSS, and then attach behavior via Java. UiBinder is sort of like this, but it is not 

Can't wait ... Would love seeing this...
I feel the pain: a company abroad makes the html/css and then I put the logic behind it with gwt... But still find it far from optimal, used UIBinder a lot in the past, but not flex enough (not-change and test friendly). 
The develop process "gap" is simple too big which reduces productivity. 

I am sure that a higher and efficient/low cost productivity, realized with GWT, will surely attract more people using it (something I put this in the vaadin survey). 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

No comments:

Post a Comment