Re: GWT.runAsync and Command Pattern

Would it be possible to wrap / unwrap the request, removing the
immediate inheritance or the compiler must generate the type
serializers eagerly for all types ever reachable?
Thanks for the advice on the interface, Frederico, i hope i can use
it. In my case, code splitting is more important than commands, i wish
they weren't mutually exclusive.

On May 30, 11:17 am, federico <federico.mona...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi julio,
>
> the issue you mentioned exists,
> anyway your ActionService interface should be:
>
> <T extends Response, V extends Request<T>> T execute(V req) throws
> ActionFailedException;
>
> on the other hands it's not possible at compile time to predict wich
> results are connected with wich requests
>
> On 30 Mag, 16:13, federico <federico.mona...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > yes
> > also i've faced this problem and didn't find any solution
> > i'think the previous issue it's connected with this:
>
> >http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2374&can=5
>
> > On 30 Mag, 15:48, Tristan <tristan.slomin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > You might be running into this issue:
>
> > >http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4412
>
> > > The compiler simply doesn't do enough analysis to do code split
> > > properly when inheritance is involved, staring the issue may help.
>
> > > Cheers
>
> > > On May 30, 7:38 am, Julio Faerman <jfaer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I am trying to split a GWT app that uses the command (action) pattern.
> > > > The problem is that  "GWT.create(ActionService.class)" causes every
> > > > subclass of the return and parameter types to be included in the
> > > > initial fragment.
>
> > > > For instance, my action interface is:
>
> > > > public interface ActionService extends RemoteService {
> > > >         <T extends Response, V extends Request> T execute(V req) throws
> > > > ActionFailedException;
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > the problem is that "module1.SomeRequest" and "module2.OtherRequest"
> > > > gets included in the initial fragment.
> > > > Do you see a way around this?
>
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Julio Faerman

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.