Tuesday, June 8, 2021

Re: Upgrade GWT from 2.7 to 2.9

Hi,

thank you guys for your responses.

So there is no breaking changes from 2.7 to 2.9. the main reason that we want to upgrade is for securities reasons, so I suggest there is no need to upgrade to 2.9 ?!  not to mention that we will have to migrate to java 8 or latest version. so a lot of work is anticipated.

do you guys have other arguments that I can provide to avoid this whole migration ?

Thank you .

Le jeudi 3 juin 2021 à 19:19:58 UTC+1, David Nouls a écrit :
Hi,

Migration is nearly invisible but if you depend on 3rd party gwt libs then there is always risk that they are no longer supported.

I ran into some backward compatibility issue with generics support with GWT2.9. It compiled on 2.8 but fails with 2.9. I did not find the time to create a bug report and code sample to demonstrate. 

Groeten,
David
On 3 Jun 2021, 18:42 +0200, HATIM SETTI <h.s...@mundiapolis.ma>, wrote:
Hi team,

I'm working on an existing project with (gwt 2.7 , maven Java 6,spring..), and we want to upgrade to 2,8 or 2.9 atest version.

And I want to know the impact of that, will we need to change a lot of code, what the steps shoud I follow ?

Also what the gain of upgrading to the latest version ? there is any improvement in term of security ?

Thanks

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/232cba3f-f910-432f-bfba-382e8d9eab9dn%40googlegroups.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/51f26ed3-7d25-4a8e-86d7-af8867b9b2fdn%40googlegroups.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment