Saturday, June 22, 2024

Re: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module


touches on the issue:
Using --add-opens should be considered a workaround.
The right thing is for libraries performing illegal access to fix their issues.

reflection  removes encapsulation: makes every element in a code unit part of its API
Strong encapsulation aids in maintainability and security.


The result is a user class that is tightly coupled to the internal implementation of the JDK.
If enough developers abuse this openness, this leads to a situation in which it is difficult or impossible 
to make changes to the internals, because to do so would break deployed libraries and applications.
This is one of the problems that modules were invented to solve.


I have found:

On app engine there's no need for --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED, only on local jetty.
This java fix for LinkedHashMap reflection failure is probably more worrying:
...
Field field = LinkedHashMap_CustomFieldSerializer.class.getDeclaredField("reflectionHasFailed");
field.setAccessible(true);
...



On Saturday 22 June 2024 at 02:53:52 BST, Craig Mitchell <mail@craig-mitchell.com> wrote:


This is because, from Java 9, access to the Java classes has been restricted.  More info:  https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41265266/how-to-solve-inaccessibleobjectexception-unable-to-make-member-accessible-m

In the case of GWT, if you want exceptions passed back via RPC, GWT needs access to the java.lang classes to serialise them to contain all the Java class details.

So, you need to add:  --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED  when running.

I didn't know it was not recommended.  Why is it bad to do?

On Saturday 22 June 2024 at 3:34:59 am UTC+10 Tim Macpherson wrote:
It happens with the latest tbroyer archetype, just change the server method so it always throws 


On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 4:20 PM, Colin Alworth
Can you share a little more detail, like the full error message with stack trace, and the GWT version you're using? Some improvements were made in this area for GWT 2.11, and some messages of this kind are merely warnings, indicating that reflection was attempted and some fallback can usually be used instead.

On Friday, June 21, 2024 at 8:45:59 AM UTC-5 tim_mac...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
SInce upgrading to Java 11,  throwing a new IllegalArgumentException in an RPC server-side implementation gives  InaccessibleObjectException. It can be stopped by using a VM argument --add-opens, but apparently this is not recommended.
Can anyone  clarify ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/0a0af252-eb15-4c39-9ecb-dc8b1cb09da3n%40googlegroups.com
.

No comments:

Post a Comment