On Sunday, 14 May 2023 at 9:50:58 pm UTC+10 lofid...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the info. A very good explanation in that video.But still don't understand why would this solution with WASM GC 2x faster than the "pure transpiling" solution? The latter is completely in JS and uses the GC from JS as it is.Does this means using JS with WASM will be 2x faster than the pure JS??? 🤣ThanksLofiCraig Mitchell schrieb am Freitag, 12. Mai 2023 um 12:27:43 UTC+2:At Google I/O 2023, they showed that WASM (Web Assembly) is finally getting garbage collection (as well as shared memory).They showed that JetBrains was experimenting with Kotlin compiling to WASM.There wasn't any mention of anyone doing Java compilation to WASM.I wonder how hard it would be to modify GWT to compile to WASM. Possible? Thoughts?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/edaac5a4-7bdd-42d0-a6af-0909da7d0573n%40googlegroups.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment