<johannes.lehma...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> OK, that is basically what I assumed. This however seems to create
> concurrency issues, which the synchronized keyword was designed to
> address. Without any language support such as semaphores or mutexes
> and without any guarantees regarding preemption, how could I solve a
> problem such as the above?
Excuse my ignorance about semaphores/mutexes/preemption details, but
how can there be concurrency issues if things never execute
concurrently? (and *your* code will never execute concurrently with
*your* code)
If you really want the gory details:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/webappapis.html#event-loops
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment