The problem is that you don't know in the beginning which issues are important. Most issues are not even bugs or hard to reproduce because it's so damn outdated.
If I want to hack on GWT I don't want to spend ages in finding relevant issues.
If you find an important bug/issue marked as AssumedStale then talk about it.
Am 09.06.2013 um 17:14 schrieb Mauro Molinari <mauromol@tiscali.it>:
> Il 09/06/2013 14:48, Johannes Barop ha scritto:
>> I had some free time lately where I wanted to work on some random issue.
>> It turned out that it is very hard to find one because all of junk
>> floating around in the tracker.
>
> I still don't understand (and never will) why old non-fixed bug reports should be considered "junk". I won't bother to open a new issue again if this is the case.
>
> Mauro.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
No comments:
Post a Comment