Re: How Gwt runAsync decides to include code... be careful...?

Thanks for your feedback.

I will open an issue these days and will links the issue and this topic.

I will put a minimum test-case on my "todo", I will do my best to add it in the comming weeks..  

- Ed

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Jens <jens.nehlmeier@gmail.com> wrote:

We're aware there are issues with the current split-point algorithm that results in dead code being included in fragments.  It's on our list of higher priority issues to investigate and fix, but I'm not sure how far along that is.  Ray Cromwell and/or Roberto Lublinerman would know.

Poor Ray, he already has a bad boy bug assigned where wrong code is generated in split points :)

-- J.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/cOpckcLFXFIJ.

To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.