Re: Jetty as Standalone Server

They are both very capable servlet containers, used by many. If you
really need or want Jetty's WebSockets then it is the deal breaker
that selects Jetty.

On Sep 27, 5:32 pm, Markus Unger <markus.unger1...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Currently I use the Tomcat as Servlet Container, but I need to use
> WebSockets. So I find the Jetty WebContainer with integrated WebSocket
> support.
>
> I search for some tutorials and looked for some books for jetty as
> webserver. But the results are low...
>
> Is there a good reason why I should not use Jetty instead of Tomcat?
>
> Thanks for help

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.