+1
04.10.2011 12:40 пользователь "Martin Ždila" <m.zdila@gmail.com> написал:
> Hello
>
> GWT is a perfect toolkit but there are still many small but frustrating
> issues open in bug-tracker and GWT developer team seems to be ignoring them
> for many months or even years. GWT issues seems not to be maintained very
> well as there are many of them not closed but are already fixed in the SVN,
> for example:
>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4392
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1534
>
> Many issues are moved from milestone to milestone for a long time. I
> personally don't need features like GPE but rather serious GWT without any
> critical issues. IMHO there should go the focus.
>
> My starred and very annoying issues are:
>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> (!)
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2931
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4394
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1888
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6604
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6603
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6600 (!!)
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6530 (there
> is even a patch attached)
>
> Also I am missing documentation of validation (JSR-303). Validation is
> really very important feature for GUI framework and it should be in GWT
> maybe in pre 2.0 version.
>
> Please take a time to focus to the most critical issues and tidy up their
> state. Our CTO is actually thinking to use more lightweight solution like
> jQuery just because of all this frustration (mostly because GWT is not very
> OSGi friendly) :-(
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZF1XevCV6FEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
-- > Hello
>
> GWT is a perfect toolkit but there are still many small but frustrating
> issues open in bug-tracker and GWT developer team seems to be ignoring them
> for many months or even years. GWT issues seems not to be maintained very
> well as there are many of them not closed but are already fixed in the SVN,
> for example:
>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4392
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1534
>
> Many issues are moved from milestone to milestone for a long time. I
> personally don't need features like GPE but rather serious GWT without any
> critical issues. IMHO there should go the focus.
>
> My starred and very annoying issues are:
>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> (!)
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2931
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367<http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars>
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4394
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1888
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6604
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6603
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6600 (!!)
> - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6530 (there
> is even a patch attached)
>
> Also I am missing documentation of validation (JSR-303). Validation is
> really very important feature for GUI framework and it should be in GWT
> maybe in pre 2.0 version.
>
> Please take a time to focus to the most critical issues and tidy up their
> state. Our CTO is actually thinking to use more lightweight solution like
> jQuery just because of all this frustration (mostly because GWT is not very
> OSGi friendly) :-(
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZF1XevCV6FEJ.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment