It is great that they put together uibinder, gwt-rpc, the editors framework and other goodies, but its your choice to use them or not.
I am personally happy with a strong gwt core, and that just keep getting better with each release.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:32 PM, camerojo <jadcpub-google@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
I also agree - I hope the Google folk look at this.
GWT is a wonderful concept, and we should all be very grateful for it,
but some of the implementation is certainly over engineered.
In particular I wish that more focus was given to fixing basic bugs
(of which there are quite a few) rather than coming up with new high
level architectural concepts.
Of course all developers would prefer to be playing around with new
concepts rather than fixing bugs in existing code, but production
software demands that basic debugging must always take priority.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications.
http://code.google.com/p/guit/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment