Thursday, June 2, 2011

Re: Reflection && Class Generator

OK, I'm making some preparations to release it on Google Code. I'll
post all the info there (I mean what it can
and cannot do and why some things are little bit different from java
reflection API). Hopefully I'll manage to do this during the
weekend...

--
Honza Rames

On 2 čvn, 13:07, Nagin Kothari <naginkoth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am very interessed on it. May you send the project to do a look to the
> code?
>
> regards
>
> Nagin Kothari
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Honza Rames <rame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, from what I can tell GWT doesn't support reflection at all in
> > client side (JS translatable) code. Just a few simple features like
> > getting class name (but I can't really call that reflection can
> > I ;-) ). I have been experimenting with reflection in client side code
> > though, and with a lot of success I must say :-). I'm planning to
> > share the code on Google Code when I feel its ready, I'm currently
> > testing it on business application I'm working on and then we'll see.
> > If you (or anybody else) would like to give it a try, I might be able
> > to create some package and share this with you (or maybe create the
> > Google Code project right away). There is similar framework (don't
> > remember the name but can be found by Google ;-) ), which didn't
> > really didn't do the job for me because it was pretty difficult to
> > generate the reflection information that is needed (please correct me
> > if I got that wrong). My approach uses GWT generators and annotations
> > to specify which packages and which classes should participate in
> > reflection information generation. I'm supporting similar
> > functionality that java Class gives you with some modifications, but
> > you can obtain annotations, get/set fields and even call public
> > methods and create new instance in reflective way (but you need to be
> > careful on what info you add because it could greatly enlarge your
> > resulting JS code). I also have unit tests (of course) for bunch of
> > stuff but it would require a lot of cleanup I guess.
>
> > So if anyone is interested just leave a message ;-)
>
> > --
> > Honza Rames
>
> > On 31 kvě, 16:20, Adolfo Panizo Touzon <adolfo.pan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Can somebody the function about de class Generator and all the similar
> > > classes which is contained int he packpage "com.google.gwt.core.ext",
> > it´s
> > > used for deferred binding?
>
> > > Maybe if I want use reflection in my app, I must use these classes??
>
> > > --
> > > El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes.
> > > Warren Buffet
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment