Re: gwt 2.1 - what is correct DAO architecture while using RequestFactory?

Ramon,

Here's the GWT issue for the requested change:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5482

/dmc

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Ramon Buckland <ramon@thebuckland.com> wrote:
>> Though there are shortcomings in the RC1 release; which includes the
>> findXxx static method on your entities (data model).
>> I've heard this will be sorted out in a 2.1.1 release shortly after
>> the 2.1.0.
>>
>
> This design, I assume, comes from how Spring-ROO has the finder
> 'design' embedded via Aspects into the Domain Model.
>
> Is there an issue number for this change?
>
> Like agi, I have a sizeable application with an existing DAO layer.
> The DAO layer, is "pluggable" into the Domain Objects but it certainly
> does not feel right to do this.
>
> I played with Spring-ROO for a good couple of weeks and found the
> Aspect nature, though "neat", slows the development process down
> somewhat (Eclipse).
>
> Might have to create a "custom" RequestFactory that does not need this
> dependency I fear.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>

--
David Chandler
Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.