Sunday, September 26, 2010

Re: Setting id for record @DataTransferObject

On 24 sep, 22:01, sheamus <ohall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello - is it possible to set the id for a @DataTransferObject instead
> of the jpa generated one? I'm using 2.1M3
>
> I've tried creating the id property but this fails because the
> property 'id' is already set in the super class Record, and have tried
> to add the setter setId() but this fails with
> 'The type UserRecordImpl must implement the inherited abstract method
> UserRecord.setId(Long)'

In the upcoming M4, EntityProxy (the new name for Record) no longer
defines getId(); you have to define it on your own record/entity-proxy
interfaces (types known to work: Long and String), so I suppose you
can define a setter too (haven't yet finished converted my code from
M2 to trunk/M4).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment